Am Freitag, den 15.01.2016, 16:32 +0000 schrieb James Hartley: > Hi Philipp, > > Thanks for the quick review, > > On 01/15/16 15:57, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 15.01.2016, 14:44 +0000 schrieb James Hartley: > [..] > >> +Example: > >> + > >> + pistachio_reset: reset-controller { > >> + compatible = "img,pistachio-reset"; > >> + img,cr-periph = <&cr_periph>; > >> + #reset-cells = <1>; > >> + }; > > If this is just a register in the cr_periph syscon, why not put the > > reset-controller node inside the cr_periph node: > > > > cr_periph: syscon@xyz { > > compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd"; > > pistachio_reset: reset-controller { > > compatible = "img,pistachio-reset"; > > #reset-cells = <1>; > > }; > > }; > > > > And in the driver use > > syscon_node_to_regmap(np->parent); > > instead of > > syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "img,cr-periph"); > > ? > > Yes that makes sense, I'll look at changing that for a V2 patchset. > > > Do you need a reg property, or is will the register offset be 0 in all > > pistachio variants? > > The offset will always be 0 for all pistachio variants. Ok. > [..] > > +Example: > > + > > + spdif_out: spdif-out@18100d00 { > > + ... > > + resets = <&pistachio_reset PISTACHIO_RESET_SPDIF_OUT>; > > + reset-names = "rst"; > > reset-names is not needed for devices that only have one reset. > > Agreed, but there are already audio drivers that pistachio uses that > have been merged upstream > using this name in their dt-entries - is there any harm in leaving it in? That was just a remark. As long as this requirement is there from the beginning and it is used consistently, I don't mind. best regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html