On 30/12/15 15:09, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review.
On 29/12/15 18:35, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:10:11PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Juno r2 is identical to Juno r1 with Cortex A57 cores replaced by
Cortex A72 cores.
That's a bigger change than I'd expect...
I am not sure if I understood what you meant by that. Do you want me to
elaborate with more details ?
No, just my commentary that I'd expect r1 -> r2 to be a board or Si
spin rather than a whole new core.
Ah OK, yes it's new Si and has other minor updates like latest revisions
of Cortex-A53 and other IPs. I just mentioned only the DT visible
changes in the commit log.
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm-boards | 1 +
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 1 +
This should probably be a separate patch, but I already have a patch in
my tree for 4.5 adding arm,cortex-a72. So just drop this hunk.
OK, will post DT binding separately.
No need, it is already in my tree.
Sorry for not being clear earlier. I was referring the "arm,juno-r2"
compatible addition. I assume you have no objection if it's part of the
same patch.
+ pcie-controller@40000000 {
+ compatible = "arm,juno-r1-pcie", "plda,xpressrich3-axi",
"pci-host-ecam-generic";
Is this common with r1?
AFAIK it is. Liviu can you confirm ?
Then perhaps you should move this to a common spot.
True, will wait for Liviu's response.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
