On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 07:36:33PM -0500, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
> From: David Rivshin <drivshin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link properties are mutually exclusive,
> and only one need be specified. However if phy-handle was specified, an
> error message would complain about the lack of phy_id or fixed-link.
>
> Also, if phy-handle was specified and the subsequent of_phy_connect()
> failed, the error message still referenced slaved->data->phy_id, which
> would be empty. Instead, use the name of the device_node as a useful
> identifier.
>
> Fixes: 9e42f715264f ("drivers: net: cpsw: add phy-handle parsing")
> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This would require some adjustments to backport to 4.3-stable due to
> other changes in this area. Let me know if you want a version of this
> against v4.3.3.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt | 4 ++--
For the binding:
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
