Hi Mark,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 06:49:43PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On 07/12/15 18:24, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> >+ L2_CA57: cache-controller@0 {
>>> >+ compatible = "cache";
>>> >+ arm,data-latency = <4 4 1>;
>>> >+ arm,tag-latency = <3 3 3>;
>>>
>>> Interesting, only PL2xx/3xx cache controller driver reads this from the
>>> DT and configures the controller. The integrated L2 found in
>>> A15/A7/A57/A53 needs doesn't make use of these values from the DT.
>>
>> These properties seem to be from l2cc.txt, which really only corresponds
>> to PL210/PL220/PL310 (and variants) and isn't as generic as it sounds.
>>
>> I don't see that these are necessary at all.
>
> The datasheet does mention the data/tag RAM latencies/setup values, so
> I put them in DT using the properties I could fine.
Furthermore these values are different for different SoCs in the same family
(e.g. r8a7790 vs. other R-Car Gen2 members), even though they seem to
have the same Cortex-A15 cores.
So to me these look like properties we want to document in the DTS...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
