Am Dienstag, den 08.12.2015, 10:54 +0100 schrieb Steffen Trumtrar: > The RX6110 comes in two different variants: SPI and I2C. > This driver only supports the SPI variant. > > If the need ever arises to also support the I2C variant, this driver > could easily be refactored to support both cases. > > Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I have a few suggestions: [...] > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx6110.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx6110.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..aa9d89d5d2de > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx6110.c > @@ -0,0 +1,438 @@ > +/* > + * Driver for the Epson RTC module RX-6110 SA > + * > + * Copyright(C) 2015 Pengutronix, Steffen Trumtrar <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + * Copyright(C) SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION 2013. All rights reserved. > + * > + * This driver software is distributed as is, without any warranty of any kind, > + * either express or implied as further specified in the GNU Public License. > + * This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the GNU > + * Public License, version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * See the file COPYING in the main directory of this archive for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with > + * this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. > + */ > + > +#include <linux/bcd.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > +#include <linux/of_gpio.h> I think these three can be dropped. > +#include <linux/regmap.h> > +#include <linux/rtc.h> > +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> > + > +/* RX-6110 Register definitions */ [...] > + > +static struct spi_driver rx6110_driver; Several drivers do this. Instead of the forward declaration and using rx6110_driver.driver.name in devm_rtc_device_register below, why not just have a #define RX6110_DRIVER_NAME "rx6110-rtc" and reuse that? Actually, I think the "-rtc" suffix is superfluous in the rtc name. I'd just use "rx6110" as a parameter to devm_rtc_device_register. > +struct rx6110_data { > + struct rtc_device *rtc; > + struct regmap *regmap; > +}; [...] > +/** > + * rx6110_init - initialize the rx6110 registers > + * > + * @rx6110: pointer to the rx6110 struct in use > + * > + */ > +static int rx6110_init(struct rx6110_data *rx6110) > +{ > + struct rtc_device *rtc = rx6110->rtc; > + int ext; > + int flags; > + int ctrl; ctrl is unused, except in the dev_dbg to print 0 below. > + int ret; > + > + /* set reserved register 0x17 with specified value of 0xB8 */ > + ret = regmap_write(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_RES1, 0xB8); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* set reserved register 0x30 with specified value of 0x00 */ > + ret = regmap_write(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_RES2, 0x00); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* set reserved register 0x31 with specified value of 0x10 */ > + ret = regmap_write(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_RES3, 0x10); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = regmap_write(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_IRQ, 0x0); > + if (ret) > + return ret; Maybe combine those using regmap_multi_reg_write? Not sure if the sequence can be reordered to also include the writes below. > + ret = regmap_update_bits(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_EXT, > + RX6110_BIT_EXT_TE, 0); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* get current extension, flag, control register values */ > + ret = regmap_read(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_EXT, &ext); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = regmap_read(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_FLAG, &flags); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* clear ctrl register */ > + ret = regmap_write(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_CTRL, 0); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ctrl = 0; This is unused ... > + ret = regmap_write(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_ALMIN, 0); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = regmap_write(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_ALHOUR, 0); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = regmap_write(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_ALWDAY, 0); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + dev_dbg(&rtc->dev, "ext: %x, flag: %x, ctrl: %x\n", ext, flags, ctrl); ... except here. > + > + /* check for VLF Flag (set at power-on) */ > + if ((flags & RX6110_BIT_FLAG_VLF)) > + dev_warn(&rtc->dev, "Voltage low, data loss detected.\n"); > + > + /* check for Alarm Flag */ > + if (flags & RX6110_BIT_FLAG_AF) > + dev_warn(&rtc->dev, "An alarm may have been missed.\n"); > + > + /* check for Periodic Timer Flag */ > + if (flags & RX6110_BIT_FLAG_TF) > + dev_warn(&rtc->dev, "Periodic timer was detected\n"); > + > + /* check for Update Timer Flag */ > + if (flags & RX6110_BIT_FLAG_UF) > + dev_warn(&rtc->dev, "Update timer was detected\n"); > + > + /* clear all flags BUT VLF */ > + ret = regmap_update_bits(rx6110->regmap, RX6110_REG_FLAG, > + RX6110_BIT_FLAG_AF | > + RX6110_BIT_FLAG_UF | > + RX6110_BIT_FLAG_TF, > + 0); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + return 0; > +} [...] > +/** > + * rx6110_probe - initialize rtc driver > + * @spi: pointer to spi device > + */ > +static int rx6110_probe(struct spi_device *spi) > +{ > + struct rx6110_data *rx6110; > + int err; > + > + if ((spi->bits_per_word && spi->bits_per_word != 8) > + || (spi->max_speed_hz > 2000000) > + || (spi->mode != (SPI_CS_HIGH | SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA))) { > + dev_warn(&spi->dev, "SPI settings: bits_per_word: %d, max_speed_hz: %d, mode: %xh\n", > + spi->bits_per_word, spi->max_speed_hz, spi->mode); > + dev_warn(&spi->dev, "driving device in an unsupported mode"); > + } > + > + rx6110 = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*rx6110), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!rx6110) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + rx6110->regmap = devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, ®map_spi_config); > + if (IS_ERR(rx6110->regmap)) { > + dev_err(&spi->dev, "regmap init failed for rtc rx6110\n"); Maybe print the error code. > + return PTR_ERR(rx6110->regmap); > + } > + > + spi_set_drvdata(spi, rx6110); > + > + rx6110->rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&spi->dev, > + rx6110_driver.driver.name, That could be just "rx6110" instead of "rx6110-rtc" in my opinion. > + &rx6110_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE); > + > + if (IS_ERR(rx6110->rtc)) > + return PTR_ERR(rx6110->rtc); > + > + err = rx6110_init(rx6110); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + rx6110->rtc->max_user_freq = 1; > + > + return 0; > +} regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
