On Wednesday 25 November 2015 13:03:10 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [151125 11:50]: > > On Wednesday 25 November 2015 10:16:44 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > At least I don't have better solutions in mind. > > > > I would be happier if we could restrict this as much as possible to the > > boards that need it, as an opt-in. That way it doesn't become an ABI > > for people that don't already rely in this information. How about > > adding a check the code adds the linux,atags property to do it > > only for a whitelist of board numbers? > > Or populate /proc/atags only for the ones that need it from machine > specific init_early? That would also address my main concern about /proc/atags, but still leave the atags in /proc/device-tree/chosen/linux,atags, and it would be bad if someone who currently uses /proc/atags changes their code to use the other file instead of finding a proper solution. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
