On 11/20, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 20/11/15 10:46, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 11/19, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> On 19/11/15 17:00, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>> On 29/10/15 18:23, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>>> This patch series adds support for the Broadcom BCM63138 DSL SoCs > >>>> clocking framework. > >>>> > >>>> Since the HW is identical to the one found in Broadcom iProc SoCs, but the > >>>> integration is different (obviously), there is still a new compatible string > >>>> introduced just in case we happen to find issues in the future. > >>>> > >>>> Stephen, could you stage the two patches in a clk-bcm63xx branch that I could > >>>> later utilize while doing the arm-soc DT pull request? > >>> > >>> Stephen, can you queue the first two patches in a topic branch for me to > >>> merge as part of the commit adding the DTS changes? > >> > >> Well, now that I look back at the changes, you can actually merge the > >> two patches in clk-next, and the DTS changes can come in before or > >> after, it does not really matter, this would not cause breakage or > >> anything. Sorry for the noise. > > > > Really? I thought if the clk patches aren't there then the dts > > change would cause some clocks to be orphaned. If that's ok with > > you it's ok with me. > > Woah, I guess I was not thinking very clearly yesterday, yes, we need to > bundle these changes together, so if you are still okay with the topic > branch for me to include as a merge commit, that's fine with me as well. Ok. Done. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
