On 11/19, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 19/11/15 17:00, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > On 29/10/15 18:23, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> This patch series adds support for the Broadcom BCM63138 DSL SoCs > >> clocking framework. > >> > >> Since the HW is identical to the one found in Broadcom iProc SoCs, but the > >> integration is different (obviously), there is still a new compatible string > >> introduced just in case we happen to find issues in the future. > >> > >> Stephen, could you stage the two patches in a clk-bcm63xx branch that I could > >> later utilize while doing the arm-soc DT pull request? > > > > Stephen, can you queue the first two patches in a topic branch for me to > > merge as part of the commit adding the DTS changes? > > Well, now that I look back at the changes, you can actually merge the > two patches in clk-next, and the DTS changes can come in before or > after, it does not really matter, this would not cause breakage or > anything. Sorry for the noise. Really? I thought if the clk patches aren't there then the dts change would cause some clocks to be orphaned. If that's ok with you it's ok with me. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
