On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:31:54PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 11/06, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:29:02PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > + > > > > + mux = kzalloc(sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL); > > > > + if (!mux) > > > [..] > > > > + goto free_reset; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + return; > > > > + > > > > +free_reset: > > > > + kfree(reset_data); > > > > +free_clk: > > > > + clk_unregister(clk); > > > > > > We really ought to have a clk_composite_unregister() API. > > > > Can we? > > > > We can always unregister the clock itself, but do we have a way to > > retrieve the structure that has been allocated in there? > > > > (note that it also applies to the generic clocks registration: muxes, > > dividers, and so on). > > Yes we have a way. We've done the same sort of design for other > generic clocks. Do the __clk_get_hw() thing like in clk-divider.c Ack. I'll cook up a patch for this then. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature