On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:22:09PM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 of October 2013 15:43:19 Sachin Kamat wrote:
> > On 30 October 2013 15:39, Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> Hi Leela,
> > >>
> > >> On 30 October 2013 15:21, Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>> This patch adds pmusysreg node to Exynos5 dtsi file to handle PMU
> > >>> register accesses in a centralized way using syscon driver
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 5 +++++
> > >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
> > >>> index e52b038..918e732 100644
> > >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
> > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
> > >>> @@ -106,4 +106,9 @@
> > >>> #size-cells = <0>;
> > >>> status = "disabled";
> > >>> };
> > >>> +
> > >>> + pmu_sys_reg: pmusysreg@1004000 {
> > >>> + compatible = "syscon";
> > >>> + reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>;
> > >>> + };
> > >>> };
> > >>
> > >> Had a look at this in a bit detail and found the following.
> > >> The register base address for this block on 5250 and 5420 as per the
> > >> TRM is 0x10050000.
> > >>
> > >> Also, the binding document specifies the naming convention. According
> > >> to it this node
> > >> should like:
> > >>
> > >> sys_reg: sysreg@10050000 {
> > >> compatible = "samsung,exynos5-sysreg", "syscon";
> > >> reg = <0x10050000 0x500>;
> > >> };
> > >>
> > >
> > > I know, but here my intention is not to regmap system register (0x10050000),
> > > but instead PMU register (0x10040000), Hence created this node.
> >
> > This clashes with the existing binding for this type of node. Probably
> > you will need to
> > define it differently?
>
> PMU and System Registers are two completely separate entities. However
> a generic syscon binding can be used to represent both, because they are
> just collections of registers shared by multiple IPs.
>
I would suggest for the participants in this discussion to send Reviewed-by:
or Acked-by: feedback once you are happy with the patches. I am sure this
would help Wim tremendously when deciding if the series is ready for
integration.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
