On 30 October 2013 15:39, Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Leela,
>>
>> On 30 October 2013 15:21, Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This patch adds pmusysreg node to Exynos5 dtsi file to handle PMU
>>> register accesses in a centralized way using syscon driver
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <l.krishna@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>>> index e52b038..918e732 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi
>>> @@ -106,4 +106,9 @@
>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + pmu_sys_reg: pmusysreg@1004000 {
>>> + compatible = "syscon";
>>> + reg = <0x10040000 0x5000>;
>>> + };
>>> };
>>
>> Had a look at this in a bit detail and found the following.
>> The register base address for this block on 5250 and 5420 as per the
>> TRM is 0x10050000.
>>
>> Also, the binding document specifies the naming convention. According
>> to it this node
>> should like:
>>
>> sys_reg: sysreg@10050000 {
>> compatible = "samsung,exynos5-sysreg", "syscon";
>> reg = <0x10050000 0x500>;
>> };
>>
>
> I know, but here my intention is not to regmap system register (0x10050000),
> but instead PMU register (0x10040000), Hence created this node.
This clashes with the existing binding for this type of node. Probably
you will need to
define it differently?
--
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
