On 10/31/2015 12:47 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015, 11:42:29 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 10/30/2015 04:43 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
Hi Daniel,
在 2015年10月01日 03:14, Heiko Stübner 写道:
Hi Daniel,
Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.
Says:
/tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand
1 --
`dsb`
...
The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64,
Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param
is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and
dsb(sy)
are the same.
Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them
to go
through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right?
I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-)
In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:-
Yes, by acking the patch I say I am ok with it and I agree it can go
through another tree.
although I guess the two clocksource changes could very well just go
through your tree. dsb() -> dsb(sy) is supposed to be equal and the second
one is just cosmetics. The Kconfig and dts changes need to wait in any case
for 4.5 ... but I guess that may be true for the clocksource changes as well?
Ok, I will take the two first patches through my tree.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
