Hi Daniel, Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015, 11:42:29 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > On 10/30/2015 04:43 AM, Caesar Wang wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > 在 2015年10月01日 03:14, Heiko Stübner 写道: > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > >>> On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote: > >>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform, > >>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip. > >>>> > >>>> Says: > >>>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand > >>>> 1 -- > >>>> `dsb` > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64, > >>>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param > >>>> is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and > >>>> dsb(sy) > >>>> are the same. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them > >> to go > >> through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right? > > > > I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-) > > In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:- > > Yes, by acking the patch I say I am ok with it and I agree it can go > through another tree. although I guess the two clocksource changes could very well just go through your tree. dsb() -> dsb(sy) is supposed to be equal and the second one is just cosmetics. The Kconfig and dts changes need to wait in any case for 4.5 ... but I guess that may be true for the clocksource changes as well? Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
