On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 01:49:17PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 23-10-15, 01:39, Mark Brown wrote: > > I'm not sure that's > > a place we want to end up just yet, I think it's safer to just have a > > little bit of code in the kernel that glues things together in the cases > > where this is needed. > So you are effectively saying that we shouldn't go ahead with multi > regulator support in OPP library, right? Well, I think things like libraries for getting the data tables out of DT are fine but I'm not convinced that trying to avoid having any device specific code at all is sufficiently clear yet - as far as I know we're mostly looking at a fairly small subset of devices still and with things like sequencing in the mix it's a bit worrying to me to be putting it all into an ABI intended to be used with no knowledge of the platform.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
