On 10/16, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15-10-15, 17:22, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > I'm lost why we need this property at all. What happened to using > > > > opp-microvolt-0 = <1 2 3>; > > opp-microvolt-1 = <1>; > > opp-microvolt-2 = <3 4 5>; > > etc. > > Perhaps you are confusing this with the bindings we came up for > picking right voltage levels based on the cuts/version of the hardware > we are running on. The problem that Lee Jones mentioned and that can > be used in your case as well. Isn't that what this patch series is for? > > > That seems to avoid any problem with 3 vs. 1 element properties > > combined into one large array. > > That's not the problem I was trying to solve here. What problem are you trying to solve then? > > > Having supply-names seems too > > brittle and would tie us to a particular OPP user's decision to > > call supplies by some name. > > No. The name has to match the <name>-supply property present in the > device's node, that's why we need this property :) Why does it need to match? Sorry I'm totally lost now. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
