Hi Shawn, Le Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:31:45 +0800, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:20:11AM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > > Hi Shawn, > > > > Le Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:15:34 +0800, > > Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > > config FB_IMX > > > > tristate "Freescale i.MX1/21/25/27 LCD support" > > > > - depends on FB && IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_IMX_FB > > > > + depends on FB && HAVE_IMX_FB > > > > > > Or simply have it depend on ARCH_MXC? > > > > > > depends on FB && ARCH_MXC > > > > > but not all MXC have IMX_FB : isn't that a problem ? > > Is it really a problem that you see this option when you configure an > imx51 kernel? The prompt clearly tells you do not need this option for > an imx51 kernel. Or will it cause any real problem even if you select > it for an imx51 kernel, except you build in a driver which will never be > instantiated? I've seen drivers even start drop ARCH_* dependency to > get a better randconfig build test coverage. > not really a problem for me. If the policy is not to narrow the choices to only the SOC which have the peripheral then we follow it and take your ARCH_MXC approach which is far simpler. Thanks, Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
