Re: [PATCHv6][ 3/7] ARM: imx{25,27} DT: Permit the selection of the imxfb framebuffer driver.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:20:11AM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
> 
> Le Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:15:34 +0800,
> Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > >  config FB_IMX
> > >  	tristate "Freescale i.MX1/21/25/27 LCD support"
> > > -	depends on FB && IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_IMX_FB
> > > +	depends on FB && HAVE_IMX_FB
> > 
> > Or simply have it depend on ARCH_MXC?
> > 
> > 	depends on FB && ARCH_MXC
> > 
> but not all MXC have IMX_FB : isn't that a problem ?

Is it really a problem that you see this option when you configure an
imx51 kernel?  The prompt clearly tells you do not need this option for
an imx51 kernel.  Or will it cause any real problem even if you select
it for an imx51 kernel, except you build in a driver which will never be
instantiated?  I've seen drivers even start drop ARCH_* dependency to
get a better randconfig build test coverage.

Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux