On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:33:23PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > On 08/10/2013 18:05, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > > On 10/08/2013 03:41 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:24:28PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >>> This add a compatible for the Marvell Tauros3 cache controller which > >>> is compatible with l2x0 cache controllers. While updating the binding > >>> documentation, clean up the list of possible compatibles. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > > [...] > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2cc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2cc.txt > >>> index c0c7626..a1d0cbd 100644 > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2cc.txt > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2cc.txt > >>> @@ -7,20 +7,20 @@ The ARM L2 cache representation in the device tree should be done as follows: > >>> Required properties: > >>> > >>> - compatible : should be one of: > >>> - "arm,pl310-cache" > >>> - "arm,l220-cache" > >>> - "arm,l210-cache" > >>> - "marvell,aurora-system-cache": Marvell Controller designed to be > >>> + "arm,pl310-cache" > >>> + "arm,l220-cache" > >>> + "arm,l210-cache" > >>> + "bcm,bcm11351-a2-pl310-cache": DEPRECATED by "brcm,bcm11351-a2-pl310-cache" > >>> + "brcm,bcm11351-a2-pl310-cache": For Broadcom bcm11351 chipset where an > >>> + offset needs to be added to the address before passing down to the L2 > >>> + cache controller > >>> + "marvell,aurora-system-cache": Marvell Controller designed to be > >>> compatible with the ARM one, with system cache mode (meaning > >>> maintenance operations on L1 are broadcasted to the L2 and L2 > >>> performs the same operation). > >>> - "marvell,"aurora-outer-cache: Marvell Controller designed to be > >>> - compatible with the ARM one with outer cache mode. > >>> - "brcm,bcm11351-a2-pl310-cache": For Broadcom bcm11351 chipset where an > >>> - offset needs to be added to the address before passing down to the L2 > >>> - cache controller > >>> - "bcm,bcm11351-a2-pl310-cache": DEPRECATED by > >>> - "brcm,bcm11351-a2-pl310-cache" > >>> + "marvell,aurora-outer-cache": Marvell Controller designed to be > >>> + compatible with the ARM one with outer cache mode. > >>> + "marvell,tauros3-cache": Marvell Tauros3 cache controller. > >> > >> How does the tauros3 cache differ from the other caches supported by the > >> l2x0 driver? > > > > [added Gregory to Cc] > > > > Good question. I cannot say at this time. I would have guessed that l2cc > > on Armada 1500 and Armada 370/XP are more or less the same, as both use > > Marvell's PJ4B CPU. Maybe, Gregory or Thomas can shed some light into > > this. > > > >>> - cache-unified : Specifies the cache is a unified cache. > >>> - cache-level : Should be set to 2 for a level 2 cache. > >>> - reg : Physical base address and size of cache controller's memory mapped > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > >>> index 447da6f..90c776e 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c > >>> @@ -929,6 +929,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id l2x0_ids[] __initconst = { > >>> .data = (void *)&aurora_no_outer_data}, > >>> { .compatible = "marvell,aurora-outer-cache", > >>> .data = (void *)&aurora_with_outer_data}, > >>> + { .compatible = "marvell,tauros3-cache", .data = (void *)&l2x0_data }, > >> > >> Are we intending to handle this differently later? > >> > >> Or is it 100% compatible with the pl210 or pl220? We could just require > >> an entry later in the compatible string list instead... > > > > No public documentation, no clear answer. > > > > Tauros3 isn't 100% compatible with any of the ARM l2cc above, it has > > additional "features" or "bugs" - call it whatever you want. > > > > I am not an l2cc expert, but basically I see two options: > > a) use (possibly) wrong existing compatible in current mv88de3100.dtsi > > now and fix later. > > b) add tauros3 compatible now and add (possible) quirks/marvell-specific > > properties later. > > > > IMHO b) is very likely to happen as l2x0_of_init in patch 8/8 already > > sets bits, I wasn't able to verify in public ARM l2cc docu. > > I agree with Sebastian. I don't have more information that Sebastian, but > as it is definitely a different controller of the ones from ARM, it should > have its own compatible string. Then latter when we will discover new feature > and/or bugs, we will be able to manage them without requiring people to update > their dtb. If I understood well it is the philosophy behind the device tree. Please note that I wasn't arguing for people to have to update their dtb. I was only suggesting that we'd have something like: compatible = "marvell,tauros3-cache", "arm,l220-cache"; Which would function now, and later the driver could choose to check for "marvell,tauros3-cache" and do something different. However, given that we don't have sufficient documentation to tell how close the tauros3 cache is to any ARM l2x0 variant, having just the "marvell,tauros3-cache" string in dts and supporting this in the driver makes sense to me. Cheers, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html