On 10/06/2013 10:27 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-10-04 19:16:56) >> Mike Turquette wrote: >>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-09-30 03:11:41) >>>> Mike Turquette wrote: >>>>> Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2013-09-16 07:33:45) >>>>>> On 09/12/2013 12:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>>>>> Well...I'm not sure changing to use macro is better or not at this >>>>> moment... >>>>>> I think it is. ;) It's really less error prone to have symbolic >>> names >>>>> instead >>>>>> of the plain numbers. The clock ids are defined in one place and it >>> is >>>>> more >>>>>> clear what a clock is by looking at symbolic name. It's especially >>>>> annoying >>>>>> to use plain numbers where are are many clock in a single node, like >>> 10 >>>>> or >>>>>> more. What are you main concerns with this ? >>>>> I think having the symbolic names is a win for readability. >>>>> >>>> Hmm...since Mike who is a maintainer for ccf agrees with Sylwester's >>> opinion, so I agree. Actually, I had no strong objection on this but still >>> I'm not sure using macro is really better because sometimes the name >>> doesn't give readability really I think though. >>>> Mike, can you give me your ack on clk stuff? >>> Yes, but I was thinking to take this change through the clk tree. The >>> new branch based on -rc3 will be published tonight. >>> >>> Let me know if it causes problems for you for me to take it. >>> >> Uhm, I think dt changes can make ugly conflicts because of spread dt changing? > Sure, go ahead and take the patches then. > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Regards, > Mike I can create patchset based on different git branch if neccessary. Regards Andrzej >> - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
