Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2013-09-16 07:33:45) > > On 09/12/2013 12:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > Well...I'm not sure changing to use macro is better or not at this > moment... > > > > I think it is. ;) It's really less error prone to have symbolic names > instead > > of the plain numbers. The clock ids are defined in one place and it is > more > > clear what a clock is by looking at symbolic name. It's especially > annoying > > to use plain numbers where are are many clock in a single node, like 10 > or > > more. What are you main concerns with this ? > > I think having the symbolic names is a win for readability. > Hmm...since Mike who is a maintainer for ccf agrees with Sylwester's opinion, so I agree. Actually, I had no strong objection on this but still I'm not sure using macro is really better because sometimes the name doesn't give readability really I think though. Mike, can you give me your ack on clk stuff? Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
