> -----Original Message----- > From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:38 AM > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: updating ePAPR > > Stuart, > > Is there any activity to update ePAPR? If not what would be involved in > doing so? The ePAPR committee has not been meeting as we've not had proposed changes in the last couple of years. > We are having some discussion about unit addresses and what ePAPR says in > section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" about them. Technically the soc > nodes in most (if not all) PPC dts would be in violation of what is > stated here, in addition I don't think the simple-bus binding says > anything about node names. > > Here's a link to some of the discussion: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/19/301 It's a matter of the committee meeting, agreeing on proposed changes, voting. And then following the power.org approval process which takes a few months. I would prefer including other updates at the same time before incurring the bureaucratic overhead. ePAPR 1.1 came out in 2011. I wonder if there are other changes that would make sense to include. I will ping the power.org mailing list to see if anyone is aware of any updates needed. Stuart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
