On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:49:41AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 09/19/2013 06:18 AM, David Gibson wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:23:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies that > >> any node that has a reg property must include a unit address in > >> its name with value matching the first entry in its reg property. > >> Conversely, if a node does not have a reg property, the node name > >> must not include a unit address. > >> > >> Adjust all the dtc test-cases to conform to this rule. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Yeah, the testcase examples were built as purely syntactic > > exercises without really considering dt content conventions. > > Fixing them up is arguably unnnecessary, but certainly doesn't hurt > > and makes them better as examples. > > > > Applied and pushed. > > Strange; I see that the git author field ended up as you rather than > me. Did you need to apply the patch manually for some reason (if so, > what did I do wrong?) or did something go wrong in the patch > application process? Oh, dammit. git citool did that when I added my S-o-b, and I forgot to fix it up. I just patched it up and did a push -f, I hope not too many people have pulled in the meantime :(. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Attachment:
pgpEuou5HugX1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
