On 09/19/2013 06:18 AM, David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:23:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies that >> any node that has a reg property must include a unit address in >> its name with value matching the first entry in its reg property. >> Conversely, if a node does not have a reg property, the node name >> must not include a unit address. >> >> Adjust all the dtc test-cases to conform to this rule. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Yeah, the testcase examples were built as purely syntactic > exercises without really considering dt content conventions. > Fixing them up is arguably unnnecessary, but certainly doesn't hurt > and makes them better as examples. > > Applied and pushed. Strange; I see that the git author field ended up as you rather than me. Did you need to apply the patch manually for some reason (if so, what did I do wrong?) or did something go wrong in the patch application process? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
