On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 09:48:34AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 09/18/2013 09:46 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > How about moving these to optional instead of removing them completely > > (or just leaving them alone)? That way if the driver does want to start > > using them people will have hooked them up already so no updates will be > > required. > the definitions as they stand now make no sense as the ordering of the > interrupts are undefined - example is the first index RX or TX? the > alternative will be PIO McASP driver, which might be nice, but having > a vague binding with 0 code behind is of no use for anyone right? So the sensible fix seems to be to specify the order rather than remove them then...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
