On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:08:39PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 of August 2013 18:53:34 Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > +static struct of_device_id max77693_dt_match[] = {
> > + {.compatible = "maxim,max77693"},
> > + {},
> > +};
> > +#endif
> As far as I'm aware of, you don't need explicit OF match table for I2C
> devices, because the I2C OF core can use the array of struct i2c_device_id
> pointed by .id_table field of struct i2c_driver.
> I'm not sure if a separate OF table isn't preferred, though, so your patch
> might be fine.
It's still good practice to explicitly define a binding since that
gives a vendor prefix and there are overlaps out there in chip vendor
namings - for example both Wolfson and Wondermedia use "WMxxxx".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
