Hi Andrzej,
On Wednesday 21 of August 2013 18:53:34 Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> This patch adds only of_match_table.
> There are no device specific properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/max77693.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77693.c b/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
> index 27f5da3..e0b11a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/max77693.c
> @@ -225,11 +225,19 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops max77693_pm = {
> .resume = max77693_resume,
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static struct of_device_id max77693_dt_match[] = {
> + {.compatible = "maxim,max77693"},
> + {},
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> static struct i2c_driver max77693_i2c_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "max77693",
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .pm = &max77693_pm,
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(max77693_dt_match),
As far as I'm aware of, you don't need explicit OF match table for I2C
devices, because the I2C OF core can use the array of struct i2c_device_id
pointed by .id_table field of struct i2c_driver.
I'm not sure if a separate OF table isn't preferred, though, so your patch
might be fine.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
