Hi Tomasz! On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible : "tl,trusted-foundations" >> +- version-major : major version number of Trusted Foundations firmware >> +- version-minor: minor version number of Trusted Foundations firmware > > Hmm, maybe you could simply define a single version property that could > have multiple cells? Like: > > firmware { > compatible = "tl,trusted-foundations"; > version = <2 8>; > }; I'm fine this way too, but do we have other bindings that use the same scheme? What is the general convention for version number bindings? >> + This option allows the kernel to invoke the secure monitor > whenever >> + required on devices using Trusted Foundations. >> + >> + Devices using Trusted Foundations should pass a device tree >> containing + a node compatible with "tl,trusted-foundations" to >> signal the presence + of the secure monitor. > > What about pointing to the documentation file instead? Yes, that would make more sense. >> +void of_register_trusted_foundations(void) >> +{ >> + struct device_node *node; >> + >> + node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "tl,trusted- > foundations"); > > nit: > if (!node) > return; Fixed, thanks. >> +static inline void register_trusted_foundations( >> + struct > trusted_foundations_platform_data *pd) >> +{ >> + pr_crit("No support for Trusted Foundations, stopping...\n"); >> + BUG(); > > Hmm, why not simply panic()? Fixed that too. Thanks for the review! Alex. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html