On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/23/2013 12:38 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> It can't be stopped but I consider it a bug if they do, as the proper >> way to handle such GPIO lines is the sequence: >> >> request_gpio(gpio); >> request_irq(gpio_to_irq(gpio)); > > Back in the old days of ARM board files, there were many boards that > didn't do this. I guess that doesn't make it any less of a bug, but it > certainly implies to me that solving this in a way that caters to that > bug being present will be a lot more useful. I was more thinking along the lines of trying to avoid the unpleasant lack of control when doing this with platform data and hard-coded GPIO numbers by restricting the way it can be done in the device tree. Hoping that there were no offenders in there already ... I guess it has to hit linux-next before we know that. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
