Re: [PATCH 3/5] drivers: thermal: make usage of CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27-08-2013 20:13, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On 二, 2013-08-27 at 23:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 02:26:41 PM Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>> On 23-08-2013 19:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> On Friday, August 23, 2013 06:03:14 PM Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>>>>> When registering a new thermal_device, the thermal framework
>>>>> will always add a hwmon sysfs interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch adds a flag to make this behavior optional. Now
>>>>> when registering a new thermal device, the caller needs
>>>>> to say if the hwmon interface is required.
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to keep same behavior as of today, all current
>>>>> calls will by default create the hwmon interface.
>>>>
>>>> Well, instead of modifying all of the callers this way, why don't
>>>> you add new versions taking the additional argument as, for example,
>>>>
>>>> thermal_zone_device_register_full()
>>>>
>>>> and redefine the old ones as static inline wrappers, for example
>>>>
>>>> static inline struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_zone_device_register(args)
>>>> {
>>>> 	return thermal_zone_device_register_full(args, true);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>
>>> Yeah, that is another way to go and I thought of doing it like that. I
>>> just could not come out with a good API naming:
>>>
>>> thermal_zone_device_register_full(all args)
>>>
>>> thermal_zone_device_register(args) /* on hwmon == true */
>>> thermal_zone_device_register_no_hwmon(args) /* on hwmon == false */
>>>
>>> Would this sound reasonable naming?
>>
>> Yeah, sounds good to me.
>>
> Well, actually, Tianyu is working on a patch set to move all the
> thermal_zone_device_register() parameters to struct thermal_zone_params.
> 
> But with that patch set done, what you need to do next is just to
> introduce a new field in struct thermal_zone_params and make sure 0
> means registering hwmon sysfs I/F.

Rui,

Do you have a pointer to his patch?

> 
> thanks,
> rui
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Rafael
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux