>
> Hi, Pekon
>
> 2013/8/26 Gupta, Pekon <pekon@xxxxxx>:
> >>
> >> fix one thing in patch:
> >> commit id:f477b7fb13df2b843997559ff34e87d054ba6538
> >>
> >> change property spi-tx-nbits and spi-rx-nbits to optional.
> >> If User don't set spi-tx-nbits or spi-rx-nbits, spi device mode
> >> should be regarded as SINGLE, not return an error.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: wangyuhang <wangyuhang2014@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/spi/spi.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> ----
> >> --
> >> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> >> index 50f7fc3..46a55f0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> >> @@ -872,46 +872,42 @@ static void of_register_spi_devices(struct
> >> spi_master *master)
> >> /* Device DUAL/QUAD mode */
> >> prop = of_get_property(nc, "spi-tx-nbits", &len);
> >> if (!prop || len < sizeof(*prop)) {
> >> - dev_err(&master->dev, "%s has no 'spi-tx-nbits'
> >> property\n",
> >> - nc->full_name);
> >> - spi_dev_put(spi);
> >> - continue;
> >> - }
> >> - switch (be32_to_cpup(prop)) {
> >> - case SPI_NBITS_SINGLE:
> >> - break;
> >> - case SPI_NBITS_DUAL:
> >> - spi->mode |= SPI_TX_DUAL;
> >> - break;
> >> - case SPI_NBITS_QUAD:
> >> - spi->mode |= SPI_TX_QUAD;
> >> - break;
> >> - default:
> >> - dev_err(&master->dev, "spi-tx-nbits value is not
> >> supported\n");
> >> - spi_dev_put(spi);
> >> - continue;
> >> + /* set tx mode in SINGLE as default */
> > [Pekon]: I think you should explicitly set, and not trust spi->mode defaults.
> > spi->mode |= SPI_TX_SINGLE;
> >
> Now @spi_device->mode [bit8: SPI_TX_DUAL] [bit9: SPI_TX_QUAD] [bit10:
> SPI_RX_DUAL] [bit11: SPI_RX_QUAD]. Because to every spi controller,
> SPI SINGLE must be supported, so I did not add that as a mode. My
> initial thought is if user don't select SPI_TX_DUAL and SPI_TX_QUAD,
> then it is TX_SINGLE mode[bit8: 0 bit9: 0].
> Now 2 approaches as follows:
> 1) #define SPI_TX_SINGLE ~(SPI_TX_DUAL | SPI_TX_QUAD)
> case SPI_NBITS_SINGLE:
> spi->mode & SPI_TX_SINGLE;
> break;
> 2)Adding a new bit in mode to specify SPI_SINGLE. But this bit also
> should be reflected to @master->mode_bits. To the probe of each spi
> controller driver, it is necessary to do "master->mode_bits |=
> SPI_TX_SINGLE | SPI_RX_SINGLE;", in such case, it's not like a
> selected mode, it's like a compulsary condition. Since all controller
> do support, there's no need to make it a mode.
>
> So I prefer the previous correction, what's your idea.
>
[Pekon]: Ok makes sense.. (1) is preferred, as it is compatible to existing layout
with regards, pekon
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
