On 23.08.2013 19:19, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Friday 23 August 2013 01:09 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 8/23/2013 10:26 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> So just stick the IP version or call it cpsw-v1... cpsw-v2 etc. >> >> If this could be handled using IP version then the right way would be to >> just read the IP version from hardware and use it. No need of DT property. >> > Thats fine as well but I thought the patch needed additional properties like > CM reg-address come from DT and hence the separate compatible. If you can > manage without that, thats even better. We can't, that's the whole point :) Well, theoretically, we could for now, but that's not a clean solution. Again: the problem here is that the control port is separated from the cpsw core, and so we have to implement something specific for the AM3352 SoC. I know that's a violation of clean and generic driver ideas, but there's no way we can assume that every cpsw v2 ip block has a control port that is compatible to the one found on am335x chips. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
