On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 04:41:16PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 03:19:00PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:30:34AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:11:19AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi > > > > > > > @@ -572,6 +572,8 @@ > > > > > > > v-i2c-supply = <&db8500_vape_reg>; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clock-frequency = <400000>; > > > > > > > + clocks = <&prcc_kclk 3 3>, <&prcc_pclk 3 3>; > > > > > > > + clock-names = "nmk-i2c.0", "apb_pclk"; > > > > > > > > > > Why do most clocks in this series have the instance number in the clock > > > > > names? This looks very wrong to me. > > > > > > > > +1. The clock names should be the input names to the unit, they > > > > shouldn't vary per instance. > > > > > > So I just had a quick look, and it looks like they each have their own > > > clock: > > > > > > clk = clk_reg_prcc_kclk("p1_i2c1_kclk", "i2cclk", > > > clkrst1_base, BIT(2), CLK_SET_RATE_GATE); > > > clk = clk_reg_prcc_kclk("p1_i2c2_kclk", "i2cclk", > > > clkrst1_base, BIT(6), CLK_SET_RATE_GATE); > > > clk = clk_reg_prcc_kclk("p2_i2c3_kclk", "i2cclk", > > > clkrst2_base, BIT(0), CLK_SET_RATE_GATE); > > > clk_register_clkdev(clk, NULL, "nmk-i2c.3"); > > > > > > /* etc */ > > > > > > When using the names in Device Tree it doesn't actually matter what > > > you call the first clock. You can call it "fred" if you wanted and it > > > would still work, but in light of the naming conventions above and the > > > fact that each clock can all be controlled independently, do we still > > > want to use the name of the parent clock i.e. i2cclk? > > > > Sorry, I don't follow. > > > > > > The name should be the name of the clock _input_ on the block described, > > as should be listed in documentation for the i2c block. The name should > > not vary with instance, and the name should not (necessarily) match the > > _output_ of the provider. Surely there's documentation for the i2c block > > that gives a name for the clock input(s)? > > It's okay, I've fixed the patches. Ok. > > Linus, branch fixed-up and pushed. > > > On a related note, I see that this doesn't follow the primecell clock > > bindings, which seem to rely on "apb_pclk" being first in the list. I > > see that other primecell device bindings don't follow that in dts or > > drivers, so I'm not sure how to fix that brokenness. > > To which bindings do you refer? After taking a *quick* look, I see it > being the other way around. Whenever the "apb_pclk" is requested, it > is done so by name: > > drivers/amba/bus.c: struct clk *pclk = clk_get(&pcdev->dev, "apb_pclk"); > > So when clk_get() calls of_clk_get_by_name(), the clock-name index is > returned correctly by of_property_match_string(), which then passes > that index through of_clk_get() and does the right thing. > > When most of the other clocks that we deal with are being requested, > they rely on being index zero: > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c: dev->clk = clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL); > > At the moment this works for us, so I don't think we need to go > around populating the name params, but we might have to if this falls > apart in some way (probably likely if you 'fixed' whatever brokenness > you're wanting to fix ;-) ) The brokenness here is that the binding document states one thing, and drivers do precisely the opposite. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/primecell.txt states: - clocks : From common clock binding. First clock is phandle to clock for apb pclk. Additional clocks are optional and specific to those peripherals. - clock-names : From common clock binding. Shall be "apb_pclk" for first clock. Yet as you've pointed out above we don't care which index apb_pblk is, but do for the other clock, which we get at index 0 (where the binding doc states apb_pclk should be). If all users are doing that currently, it's possible to fix up the binding document. If not, then it's a mess that can't be corrected... Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html