On 22/08/13 07:15, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 10:30 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@xxxxxxx> >> >> Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are >> parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need >> not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider >> that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some >> cases even incorrect logic. >> >> It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu >> device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However >> logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific. >> >> PowerPC has it's own implementation to get the cpu node for a given >> logical index. >> >> This patch refactors the current implementation of of_get_cpu_node. >> This in preparation to move the implementation to DT core library. >> It separates out the logical to physical mapping so that a default >> matching of the physical id to the logical cpu index can be added >> when moved to common code. Architecture specific code can override it. > > So the patch unfortunately collides with other changes in powerpc -next, > though it's not a huge deal and not hard to fixup, but expect Linus > to tick unless we sort it out some other way. > > Appart from that, it's fine, builds on all my test configs and doesn't > seem to negatively impact things as far as I can tell so far... > > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Hi Ben, Thanks a lot for testing and ACK. I will check with Rafael about these (trivial) conflicts. Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
