On 08/14/2013 05:22 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Updated the document as per the latest implementation. > While at it also fixed some trivial typos. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/exynos-usb.txt > EHCI > Required properties: > - - compatible: should be "samsung,exynos4210-ehci" for USB 2.0 > - EHCI controller in host mode. > - - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped > + - compatible : should be one of the following for USB 2.0 EHCI controller > + in host mode: > + (a) "samsung,exynos5440-ehci" for Exynos5440 SoC > + (b) "samsung,exynos4210-ehci" for all other Exynos4 and 5 SoCs I'm not sure the text "in host mode" belongs there. The DT should describe the presence of the EHCI controller HW module. Whether the module is programmed for host mode or device mode is surely a run-time decision, not something that would need different DT bindings? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
