On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:58:26PM +0000, William Mills wrote: >Steve, > >Can TI get on the agenda for this week's meeting? > >We have a simple approach to make progress on boot loader applied overlays. >It is a small repo with just the overlays. >It builds the dtb's from the upstream kernel repo and the overlays from this repo. >We are going to do this at git.ti.com so we can make progress. >However we would like to suggest this as a simple way forward to collectively host things the kernel maintainers do not want in the kernel. >Does it make sense to host something like this in devicetree.org github account? I think so, yes - I see Grant has already responded there. >I think this is a very reasonable way forward and more practical than: >* moving all DT's out of the kernel (or sync'ing two homes etc) >* reworking overlay support to be the "one final good way" >* everyone keeping this stuff in their own vendor trees, each doing something different and generating N solutions > >We will push the repo somewhere public before the meeting. Cool. :-) >(CC'ing Tom and Tony does not constituent their endorsement, we are starting to talk with them now also) ACK! Cheers, -- Steve McIntyre steve.mcintyre@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
