Re: [PATCH 0/2] schemas: add "cpus" schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 25 Jun 2019, Rob Herring wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 8:37 PM Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > These two patches add a common "cpus" schema.  They pass
> > dt-doc-validate as of commit 2550ac333f6ed4ceb1e785262c54ec8619df077a
> > ("meta-schemas: Allow additional keys under node properties").
> 
> Now we get a bunch of warnings because the examples are now validated
> (in next) against the schemas.

...

> The main problem is the Arm cpu schema is applied on RiscV nodes and
> vice-versa. I think since we have the common cpus schema now, we'll
> need to remove the 'cpus' node from the riscv and arm schemas so we
> only apply the schema on matching compatibles. The last one here is
> probably from cache-controller.yaml.
> 
> And then these are just from dtc which you should have seen already:

...

It's been a bit unclear to me what sort of validation steps are 
appropriate before submitting these patches, and how resulting changes are 
driven.  I usually don't develop against -next, which may be part of the 
issue.  Let me know what you want me to do.


- Paul



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photos]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux