On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 01/16/18 21:50, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Frank Rowand wrote: > > > >> Hi Julia, > >> > >> When I was creating the sample output for this reply to David, > >> I noticed that the --annotate-full annotation for the dtc > >> generated content (eg the phandle properties) are reporting > >> "/* <no-file>:<no-line> */". Did you intend to remove this, > >> as you did for the --annotate-full case? > > > >>From what you say, it is done backwards. --annotate-full was intended to > > say no file no line and --annotate was supposed to put nothing at all. > > I think it is working as intended then: > > --annotate-full says: /* <no-file>:<no-line> */ > > --annotate says: nothing Yes, that's the intent. thanks, julia > > Thanks, > > -Frank > > > > > julia > > > >> -Frank > >> > >> > >> On 01/16/18 20:13, Frank Rowand wrote: > >>> On 01/16/18 17:13, David Gibson wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 07:24:10PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > >>>>> This commit provides two new command-line options: > >>>>> > >>>>> --annotate (abbreviated -T) > >>>>> --annotate-full (abbreviated -F) > >>>> > >>>> What's the rationale for having two different versions of the > >>>> annotations? > >>> > >>> I'll put an example to try to explain, at the end of this email. > >>> > >> > >> < snip > > >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-compiler" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-compiler" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
