We need approval from Guillaume
Laura, and gibba upgrade.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 7:31 AM Laura Flores <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 9:28 AM Adam King <adking@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67583 didn't reproduce across 10 reruns https://pulpito.ceph.com/lflores-2024-08-16_00:04:51-upgrade:quincy-x-squid-release-distro-default-smithi/. Given the original failure was just "Unable to find image 'quay.io/ceph/grafana:9.4.12' locally" which doesn't look very serious anyway, I don't think there's any reason for the failure to hold up the releaseOn Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 6:53 PM Laura Flores <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The upgrade suites look mostly good to me, except for one tracker I think would be in @Adam King's realm to look at. If the new grafana issue below is deemed okay, then we can proceed with approving the upgrade suite.This issue stood out to me, where the cluster had trouble pulling the grafana image locally to redeploy it. @Adam King can you take a look?
- https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67583 - upgrade:quincy-x/stress-split: Cluster fails to redeploy grafana daemon after image is unable to be found locally
Otherwise, tests failed from cluster log warnings that are expected during upgrade tests. Many of these warnings have already been fixed and are in the stages of getting backported.I checked for each test that the cluster had upgraded all daemons to 19.1.1, and that was the case.
- https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66602 - rados/upgrade: Health check failed: 1 pool(s) do not have an application enabled (POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLED)
- https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/65422 - upgrade/quincy-x: "1 pg degraded (PG_DEGRADED)" in cluster log
- https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67584 - upgrade:quincy-x: cluster [WRN] Health check failed: 1 osds down (OSD_DOWN)" in cluster log
- https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64460 - rados/upgrade: "[WRN] MON_DOWN: 1/3 mons down, quorum a,b" in cluster log
- https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66809 - upgrade/quincy-x; upgrade/reef-x: Health check failed: Reduced data availability: 1 pg peering (PG_AVAILABILITY)" in cluster log
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 11:55 AM Laura Flores <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Rados approved. Failures tracked here: https://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rados/wiki/SQUID#v1911-httpstrackercephcomissues67340On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 11:30 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Laura,
The PR was cherry-picked and the `squid-release` branch was built.
Please review the run results in the tracker.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 2:18 PM Laura Flores <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hey @Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx>,
>
> We've fixed a couple of issues and now need a few things rerun.
>
>
> 1. *Can you please rerun upgrade/reef-x and upgrade/quincy-x? *
> - Reasoning: Many jobs in those suites died due to
> https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/66883, which we deduced was a recent
> merge to teuthology. Now that the affecting commit was reverted, we are
> ready to have those rerun.
> 2. *Can you please cherry-pick https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58607
> <https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58607> to squid-release and reschedule
> rados:thrash-old-clients?*
> - Reasoning: Since we stopped building focal for squid, we can no
> longer test squid against pacific clients.
> - For this second RC, we had to make the decision to drop pacific
> from the *rados:thrash-old-clients* tests, which will now use centos
> 9 stream packages to test against only reef and quincy clients (
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/58607).
> - We have raised https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/67469 to track the
> implementation of a containerized solution for older clients that don't
> have centos 9 stream packages, so that we can reincorporate
> pacific in the
> future.
>
> After these two things are rescheduled, we can proceed with a rados suite
> approval and an upgrade suite approval.
>
> Thanks,
> Laura
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:49 PM Adam Emerson <aemerson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 14/08/2024, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> > > Still waiting to hear back:
> > >
> > > rgw - Eric, Adam E
> >
> > Approved.
> >
> > (Sorry, I thought we were supposed to reply on the tracker.)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Laura Flores
>
> She/Her/Hers
>
> Software Engineer, Ceph Storage <https://ceph.io>
>
> Chicago, IL
>
> lflores@xxxxxxx | lflores@xxxxxxxxxx <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx>
> M: +17087388804
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
--Laura Flores
She/Her/Hers
Software Engineer, Ceph Storage
Chicago, IL
lflores@xxxxxxx | lflores@xxxxxxxxxx
M: +17087388804
Laura Flores
She/Her/Hers
Software Engineer, Ceph Storage
Chicago, IL
lflores@xxxxxxx | lflores@xxxxxxxxxx
M: +17087388804
Laura Flores
She/Her/Hers
Software Engineer, Ceph Storage
Chicago, IL
lflores@xxxxxxx | lflores@xxxxxxxxxx
M: +17087388804
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
