On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 8:20 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 2:15 PM Patrick Schlangen <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Ilya, > > > > > Am 26.02.2023 um 14:05 schrieb Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > > Isn't OpenSSL 1.0 long out of support? I'm not sure if extending > > > librados API to support a workaround for something that went EOL over > > > three years ago is worth it. > > > > fair point. However, as long as ceph still supports compiling against OpenSSL 1.0 and has special code paths to initialize OpenSSL for versions <= 1.0, I think this should be fixed. The other option would be to remove OpenSSL 1.0 support completely. > > > > What do you think? > > Removing OpenSSL 1.0 support is fine with me but it would need a wider > discussion. I'm CCing the development list. > > Thanks, > > Ilya > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx > if librados still works with openssl 1.0 when you're not using it elsewhere in the process, i don't see a compelling reason to break that. maybe just add a #warning about it to librados.h? _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
