Re: Ceph Leadership Team Meeting Minutes (2022-08-24)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Ernesto,

By the way, is the "test-failure" tag limited to CI failures, or should it also be used for integration failures? (Or any test failure). This question just came up from Adam King, and I think it's a good one to clarify.

- Laura

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:00 PM Laura Flores <lflores@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Ernesto for your work in making the CI failures easier to track! I have been working to track many of them myself, so I will be sure to add the "test-failure" tag to them. FYI for anyone tagging issues, there are two "Tags" fields on Ceph Tracker issues: one near the middle where you can manually type in a tag, and another near the bottom where you can search for existing tags. The second option is what you'll want to use to tag "test-failure" issues. I have attached an image of an example, where the correct Tags field is circled in red.

test-failure.png
As for the container vulnerabilities, I created a Tracker issue for that here that we can use to track progress/updates, if needed: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57181

On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:47 AM Ernesto Puerta <epuertat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Cephers,

These are the topics covered in today's meeting:
  • Container vulnerabilities: in the last Ceph Users-Devels Monthly meeting Gaurav Sitlani raised a question about the vulnerabilities reported by quay.io and what the process was to tackle them.
    • Currently Ceph relies on Github's dependabot to scan and fix vulnerable dependencies (mostly NPM packages). However that's not enough for distro package vulnerabilities.
    • Quay.io is very effective at that, but currently the project is not closely inspecting those.
    • Good news is that Quay offers a REST API that could be used to fetch (pull) or notify (push/webhook) the vulnerabilities in the containers.
    • David & myself will have a look at this.
  • Tracking CI failures: there's been a recent surge in the number of CI failures (partly related to the recent upgrade from Ubuntu 20 to 22). Developers sometimes struggle to see whether those come from their PRs or preexisting issues. Some ideas that could help here:
  • Coverity scans: Ceph project relied on coverity scans until 2018, when due to the adoption of newer C++ features (C++17) it stopped working. However, it seems that it's now working again even with C++20 enabled.
  • David Galloway's succession: unfortunately (for the Ceph project) David has decided to move on, so it has been started the conversation to identify all the things that David did (which are a lot) and find back-ups for those.
For a detailed description of the topics above, please visit:

Kind Regards,


Ernesto Puerta

He / Him / His

Principal Software Engineer, Ceph

Red Hat

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx


--

Laura Flores

She/Her/Hers

Software Engineer, Ceph Storage

Red Hat Inc.

La Grange Park, IL

lflores@xxxxxxxxxx   
M: +17087388804    




--

Laura Flores

She/Her/Hers

Software Engineer, Ceph Storage

Red Hat Inc.

La Grange Park, IL

lflores@xxxxxxxxxx   
M: +17087388804    


_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux