agreed, rgw is still a go for 16.2.8 On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:45 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Josh, David, assuming Casey agrees, this release is ready for publishing. > > Thx > YuriW > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:47 PM Neha Ojha <nojha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Yuri, >> >> rados and upgrade/pacific-p2p look good to go. >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:46 AM Benoît Knecht <bknecht@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 07:32:59PM +1000, Brad Hubbard wrote: >> > > It's the current HEAD of the pacific branch or, alternatively, >> > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ci/tree/pacific-16.2.8_RC2. >> > > >> > > $ git branch -r --contains 73636a1b00037ff974bcdc969b009c5ecec626cc >> > > ceph-ci/pacific-16.2.8_RC2 >> > > upstream/pacific >> > >> > Thanks Brad, I didn't realize Yuri was referring to the ceph-ci repository. >> > >> > I've upgraded one of our clusters from 16.2.7 to 16.2.8-rc2, without any issue >> > so far (but much better OMAP performance thanks to >> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46096). >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> Glad to hear it and thanks for testing the RC! >> >> > >> > I did notice that rgw still segfaults when `rgw_use_opa_authz=true` because >> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46106 didn't make the cut though. >> >> Looks like this PR was opened after we did the first freeze for 16.2.8? >> Given that we are almost ready for a release, I will add Casey for his >> thoughts on whether we need to include it or not. >> >> Thanks, >> Neha >> >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > -- >> > Ben >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx >> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx >> > >> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
