Josh, David, assuming Casey agrees, this release is ready for publishing.
Thx
YuriW
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 3:47 PM Neha Ojha <nojha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Yuri,
rados and upgrade/pacific-p2p look good to go.
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 5:46 AM Benoît Knecht <bknecht@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 07:32:59PM +1000, Brad Hubbard wrote:
> > It's the current HEAD of the pacific branch or, alternatively,
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ci/tree/pacific-16.2.8_RC2.
> >
> > $ git branch -r --contains 73636a1b00037ff974bcdc969b009c5ecec626cc
> > ceph-ci/pacific-16.2.8_RC2
> > upstream/pacific
>
> Thanks Brad, I didn't realize Yuri was referring to the ceph-ci repository.
>
> I've upgraded one of our clusters from 16.2.7 to 16.2.8-rc2, without any issue
> so far (but much better OMAP performance thanks to
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46096).
Hi Ben,
Glad to hear it and thanks for testing the RC!
>
> I did notice that rgw still segfaults when `rgw_use_opa_authz=true` because
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/46106 didn't make the cut though.
Looks like this PR was opened after we did the first freeze for 16.2.8?
Given that we are almost ready for a release, I will add Casey for his
thoughts on whether we need to include it or not.
Thanks,
Neha
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
