Hey Yuri, I didn't want you to have to test multiple times if someone were to request changes on the master PR, but I can certainly go ahead and create a Pacific backport if that's your preference. I'll go ahead and do that now! Thanks, Cory On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 1:56 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The only known (to me) remaining issue is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45904 > > Cary, is it practical to get a backport in parallel with testing on master? > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 5:18 PM Cory Snyder <csnyder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I'll handle the backport as soon as it gets merged into master. >> >> -Cory >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 2:37 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Sure >>> Can we get a backport and start testing today? >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 10:30 AM Cory Snyder <csnyder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Yuri, >>>> >>>> We were hoping to get the following fix merged and backported before >>>> the next pacific release: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45904 >>>> >>>> There is a bug in current versions of Pacific that prevents dynamic >>>> RGW bucket resharding from working on versioned buckets [1]. That bug >>>> was fixed and is included in the changes staged for 16.2.8. An upgrade >>>> to 16.2.8 could be painful for some RGW users if the aforementioned >>>> fix isn't included, because dynamic resharding will start working >>>> again, and could create exceptionally large range deletion tombstones. >>>> Without this fix, large range deletion tombstones can have >>>> catastrophic effects on cluster throughput under some workloads. >>>> >>>> Is it still possible to include it at this point? >>>> >>>> [1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51429 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Cory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 12:03 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > We merged all PRs known to be included into the next pacific and are ready to merge the repo later today and start QE validation. >>>> > >>>> > Thx >>>> > YuriW >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 3:51 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:15 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >> > >>>> >> > We tested and merged many PRs in the last week and again want to start testing the next pacific ASAP. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > I see no new issues in the queue (is:open is:pr milestone:pacific label:needs-qa) >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Please let me know what is still planned, otherwise, the repo will be locked and we will start QE validation. >>>> >> >>>> >> For RBD: >>>> >> >>>> >> - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45638 >>>> >> labeled with wip-yuri2-testing, should be OK to merge once that >>>> >> branch goes through >>>> >> >>>> >> - https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/45184 >>>> >> already tested but can't be merged yet due to a unit test issue, >>>> >> Chris is looking into it >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks, >>>> >> >>>> >> Ilya >>>> >> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx >>>> > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx >>>> _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
