Re: 14.2.22 QE nautilus (last) validation status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh this is ready for your final review and publishing .

David FYI and https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/41958

On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:50 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:19 PM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > While we are waiting for finial rbd approval pls add your commits and
> > apporavls to the Release Notes PR
>
> It appears that this bug exists in older nautilus releases (as far
> back as 14.2.12 at least) and is specific to journaling which is a
> rather narrow use case.
>
> rbd approved.
>
> Thanks,
>
>                 Ilya
>
> >
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/41958
> >
> > Thx
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 8:46 AM Mykola Golub <to.my.trociny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:19:25AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 7:00 AM Mykola Golub <to.my.trociny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:56:00PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > For rbd, there is a suspicious failure that persisted through the
> > > > > > rerun:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/yuriw-2021-06-21_15:45:39-rbd-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/6182709/teuthology.log
> > > > > > http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/yuriw-2021-06-22_15:18:36-rbd-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/6184291/teuthology.log
> > > > >
> > > > > Just FYI, it is also reproducible on v14.2.21 (sha1: 5ef401921d7a88aea18ec7558f7f9374ebd8f5a6):
> > > > >
> > > > >   http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/trociny-2021-06-24_16:42:49-rbd-wip-mgolub-testing-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/6190582/teuthology.log
> > > > >
> > > > > So it does not look like a regression. I was able to reproduce it on
> > > > > centos only while on ubuntu it always passed for me.
> > > >
> > > > Yuri's successful run which didn't include the last couple of rbd PRs
> > > > was also on ubuntu.  But I do see a green centos job among your runs so
> > > > it doesn't appear to be OS specific:
> > > >
> > > > http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/trociny-2021-06-24_15:01:11-rbd-wip-mgolub-testing-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/6189713/teuthology.log
> > >
> > > Yes it could succeed on centos. What I meant is that I had naver seen
> > > it to fail on ubuntu, though I also don't think it is OS specific. It
> > > also did not fail when I increased the rbd debug level to track the
> > > hang.
> > >
> > > > Filed https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51362 with the (so far scarce)
> > > > details.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >                 Ilya
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mykola Golub
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux