On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:19:25AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 7:00 AM Mykola Golub <to.my.trociny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 05:56:00PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > > > > > For rbd, there is a suspicious failure that persisted through the > > > rerun: > > > > > > http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/yuriw-2021-06-21_15:45:39-rbd-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/6182709/teuthology.log > > > http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/yuriw-2021-06-22_15:18:36-rbd-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/6184291/teuthology.log > > > > Just FYI, it is also reproducible on v14.2.21 (sha1: 5ef401921d7a88aea18ec7558f7f9374ebd8f5a6): > > > > http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/trociny-2021-06-24_16:42:49-rbd-wip-mgolub-testing-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/6190582/teuthology.log > > > > So it does not look like a regression. I was able to reproduce it on > > centos only while on ubuntu it always passed for me. > > Yuri's successful run which didn't include the last couple of rbd PRs > was also on ubuntu. But I do see a green centos job among your runs so > it doesn't appear to be OS specific: > > http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/trociny-2021-06-24_15:01:11-rbd-wip-mgolub-testing-nautilus-distro-basic-smithi/6189713/teuthology.log Yes it could succeed on centos. What I meant is that I had naver seen it to fail on ubuntu, though I also don't think it is OS specific. It also did not fail when I increased the rbd debug level to track the hang. > Filed https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51362 with the (so far scarce) > details. > > Thanks, > > Ilya -- Mykola Golub _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
