Re: Seastore storage structure design consideration based on HLC and R-tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Large intrinsic value though.  Historically, and the discussion has
been about the perf. and complexity trade-offs, I think.

Matt

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 1:13 PM Sam Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I added a few comments, my high level perspective is that it looks
> like an approach for dealing with multiversioned extents which might
> be a component of rados pool level point-in-time globally consistent
> snapshots for purposes like rados pool level cross-cluster
> replication.  However, that sort of thing would require a great deal
> of higher level support, so I'd consider the disk layout portion to be
> out of scope for now.  Is there another use case you are hoping to
> address with this?
> -Sam
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:47 AM Xuehan Xu <xxhdx1985126@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > The following link is a thorough description of what we think may be
> >
> > Sorry, it's a rough description, not a thorough one.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
>


-- 

Matt Benjamin
Red Hat, Inc.
315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103

http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage

tel.  734-821-5101
fax.  734-769-8938
cel.  734-216-5309
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Devel]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux