On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:03 PM Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2019, Ken Dreyer wrote: > > Sure, I'm fine with that approach until we can get all the packages > > into EPEL 8 itself. > > Should we take the latest py3 branch and push it to ceph-ci and see what > happens? Probably need to add a patch to qa/distros/centos-latest.yaml or > whatever so that we provision centos8 test nodes? I have been pushing that branch to ceph-ci.git : https://shaman.ceph.com/builds/ceph/wip-rm37865/ Not sure what needs to happen there to wire it for tests, can we get some help there? > > Thanks again to everyone working on this... who knew that ditching python > 2 would be so hard! > > sage > > > Justin, how is it going getting those packages into the main EPEL 8 > > dist-git branches? > > > > - Ken > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:26 AM Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ken > > > > > > There is a lot of interest in getting the Python3/CentOS8 pr in master > > > merged [0], but we can't do that at the moment since the dependencies > > > are missing. > > > > > > As you know, we've been building everything we need in the ceph-el8 > > > copr repo [1], and I would like your take on merging the PR in master > > > while we wait to get packages in EPEL8. This would unblock development > > > in master that can't move forward unless the CentOS8 support is there. > > > > > > I value your guidance here, and I'd like to know if you are OK with > > > this approach, or if you have any other ideas to achieve progress. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > [0] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/25969 > > > [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ktdreyer/ceph-el8/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx > > > > > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
