On 2019-12-03T19:58:55, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > An LVM-less approach is appealing. I'm not sure. LVM provides many management functions - such as being able to transparently re-map/move data from one device to another, or increasing LV sizes, say - that otherwise would need to be reimplemented by the OSD processes. > Something that explicitly does bluestore only and does not support dmcrypt > could be pretty straightforward, though... Yes, but given the current deployment ratios, I'd bet this would also not be applicable to the majority of deployments. Yes, it'd get the very very simple ones of the ground, but we'd still have to solve the actual problems. (Plus then maintain the "simple" way on top, and how to go from there to the more complex one, feature-disparities, DriveGroups for each, etc etc) -- SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, MD: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg) "Architects should open possibilities and not determine everything." (Ueli Zbinden) _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
