On 2019-11-08T11:48:39, Mike Perez <miperez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Another pass on the survey with everyone's suggestions.
Thanks! Much appreciated, and I think we could roll this.
Though the sizing questions still leave me confused. Why can't they
enter numbers for their total raw capacity?
For CephFS:
I just noticed that for the clients it's ranges, for files#, it's an
order of magnitude (I have 5mil, what do I choose? And what does 10+
mean?), then ranges (two of them overlapping) for MDS cache size, and
number of MDS is actually asked twice (with very narrow ranges, and then
as free entry; remove the former?).
I think just replacing these with number entry fields would be best. But
I'm not the CephFS expert who asked them, so take that with a large
pinch of salt.
Let's roll and then make sure everyone gets telemetry enabled so we can
stop asking :-D
Regards,
Lars
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Architects should open possibilities and not determine everything." (Ueli Zbinden)
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
