Another pass on the survey with everyone's suggestions.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:44 AM Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2019-11-04T15:11:11, Mike Perez <miperez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here's another draft with the current feedback. Sage, do you have thoughts
> on keeping any of the data protection questions per Lar's suggestions?
In addition to the comments from others:
In the CephFS section, we ask about the "typical" number of fs clients.
Everywhere else we ask about the aggregate. Is that intentional?
I'm just wondering if this tells us anything, e.g., imagine someone
responding with 5 clusters, only one of them with CephFS, "typical" then
would be "1-5"?
Should perhaps ask about the largest, like the next question - or the
total?
For active MDS, we again ask for the total and also the largest number.
Should we do the same for the previous questions for consistency?
Again, I'd turn those into number entry fields rather than drop down.
Snapshots -> No, please specify "why not"
Everything else looks good.
Joao also wants to look into if the telemetry plugin may be backportable
to Luminous. (I don't think earlier makes sense.) That'll help with the
data set for the slow adopters.
Regards,
Lars
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Architects should open possibilities and not determine everything." (Ueli Zbinden)
--
Mike Perez
he/him
Ceph Community Manager
494C 5D25 2968 D361 65FB 3829 94BC D781 ADA8 8AEA
| |
Attachment:
Ceph User Survey - Cluster(s)(2).pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
